tina_imel ([info]tina_imel) wrote,
@ 2008-04-27 21:55:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
If you're an Artist of any type PLEASE READ THIS!

I just got a very unsettling e-mail from my friend Madeline (www.madelinevonfoerster.com) concerning copy right law.  I encourage you to read what she's said here but to put it succinctly if this bill goes through we are all fucked.

 

"Hello everyone,

Under current copyright law, in effect for the last 30 years, your
visual art is copy protected whether or not it is registered or carries
the copyright symbol.

This week, the U.S. House of Representatives is expected to introduce
the Orphan Works Act of 2008. If you care about protecting your work,
you're against it. It will have the effect of wiping out any copyright
on visual art now in existence, throwing your work into the public
domain. If you wish to protect your work (each and every separate piece)
you will have to digitize it and register it with private sector
registries as yet uncreated, for a fee as yet unestablished. I say
registries because this bill places no limit on how many separate
registries there could be.

It gets worse.  Anyone can submit images, including your images. They
would then be excused from any liability for infringement (also known as
THEFT) unless the legitimate rights owner (you) responds within a
certain period of time to grant or deny permission to use your work.

That means you will also have to look through every image in every
registry all the time to make sure someone is not stealing and
registering your art. You could actually end up illegally using your own
artwork or photo if someone else registers it.

 

Please read more in this excerpt from illustratorspartnership.org;  I
know it's long, but it's worth reading.  Also, note that while their
site is geared to illustrators, everything they say applies as well to
photographers, musicians, filmmakers, painters, writers, etc:

Since the last bill died in committee in 2006, the advocates of this
legislation have promoted the creation of private commercial registries.
On January 29, 2007, a lead attorney for the Copyright Office warned us
that under their plan any work not registered with a private sector
registry would be a potential orphan from the moment it was created.

This means you would not only have to register your published work, but
also:

— Every sketch or note on every page of every sketchbook;
— Every sketch you send to every client;
— Every photograph you take anywhere, anytime, including family photos,
home videos, etc.;
— Every letter, e-mail, etc., professional, personal or private.

This Would End Passive Copyright Protection: Under existing law the
total creative output of any “creator” receives passive copyright
protection from the moment you create it. This covers everything from
the published work of professional artists to the unpublished diaries,
letters and family photos of the average citizen.

But under the Orphan Works proposal, none of this material would be
covered unless the creator took active steps to register and maintain
coverage with a commercial registry. Failure to do so would “signal” to
infringes that you have no interest in protecting the work.

The Registration Paradox:
By conceding that their proposals would make potential orphans of any
unregistered works, the Copyright Office proposals would lead to a
registration paradox: In order to “protect” work from exposure to
infringement, creators would have to expose it on a publicly searchable
registry. This would:

— Expose creative work to plagiarists and derivative abusers;
— Expose trade secrets and unused sketches to competitors;
— Expose unpublished and private correspondence to the public on the
Orwellian premise that you must expose it to “protect” it.

Yet registries will not be able to monitor infringements nor enforce
copyright compliance. Even after you've shelled out “protection money”
to a commercial registry to register hundreds of thousands of works, you
still won't be protected. A registry would do nothing more than give you
a piece of paper. You would still have to monitor infringements - which
can occur anytime anywhere in the world; then embark on an uncertain
quest to find the infringe, file a case in Federal court, then prove
that the infringer has removed your name or other identifying
information from your work. Meanwhile all the infringer will have to do
is say there was no such information on the work when he found it and
assert an orphan works defense.

Coerced registration violates the spirit and letter of international
copyright law and copyright-related treaties. And because this bill
would effectively eliminate the passive copyright protection afforded
personal correspondence, family photos, etc. it would tear one more
slender thread of privacy protection from the fabric of fundamental
rights we currently take for granted.

We urge Congress to carefully reconsider the unintended consequences of
this radical copyright proposal.

— Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner, for the Board of the Illustrators’
Partnership


So, what to do about this?  More from the Illustrators Parnership
website:

March 19, 2008

We expect a bill to be released after the Easter recess. Sources say it
will be introduced in the House and Senate simultaneously, and
fast-tracked for a vote in the House by mid-May. Advocates hope for
swift passage before the summer recess.

The decision to introduce such a radical bill so late in the session is
ominous. Because of fall elections, this will be a short Congressional
year. Any bill not passed by the end of Congress will have to
re-introduced in the next Congress. That means the bill’s sponsors must
know they have their ducks lined up.


So, I urge everyone to:

GET ON ORPHAN WORKS E-MAIL LIST

To be notified of the latest information on the Orphan Works bill and
when to contact your legislators, send an email to
illustratorspartnership@cnymail.com and ask to be added to the Orphan
Works list.  You can also visit the IPA Orphan Works Resource Page for
Artists for more information, because I didn't even detail all the
disgusting facets of this shocking legislation:
http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/01_topics/article.php?searchterm=00185

Both House and Senate versions of the Orphan Works Act of 2008 can be
downloaded from the IPA homepage:

http://illustratorspartnership.org/

And... please act!

The fastest, easiest thing is to sign a petition here:
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/no-to-orphan-works-act.html

Go to http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml to quickly find the phone
number, address and e-mail of every U.S. senator, U.S. representative,
and state legislator. In the meantime, please feel free to forward this
to all the artists you know.


Thanks for reading,

Madeline"




(Post a new comment)


[info]ladymeshel
2008-04-28 02:11 am UTC (link)
That is terrible! I hope you don't mind that I posted this in my lj.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 02:12 am UTC (link)
Nope, I really appreciate it. I wouldn't have ever even heard of this if not for Madeline, we need to get the word out.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]charlayne
2008-04-28 06:42 am UTC (link)
I am going to post the link to yours on my LJ. My daughter, Silver, is an artist and just had to deal with a theft of her artwork this year, first time. It was a really a mess, the girl wanted to take the artwork onto Cafe Express and had the OK to do so by Sil (this was illustration work for a book, oked by the author and the Cafe Express would have been a marketing addition for the book.) But the girl then started making her own "changes" to the work and my daughter got really pissed off. She had the copyright symbol on it and also had all the sketches and such both paper and digital. But when this happened,she had to talk to a lawyer to figure out what to do. She ended up having to get a cease and desist letter done, a copy of the picture sent to the National Archives with the money to get the full protected copyright, and then had to go back and do some serious watermarking to her Deviant Art site gallery.

The stress of all this has been great.

This all copyright mess makes my head spin, all I care about is that my daughter's work is safe (and my younger daughter too, she's getting good herself).

Thanks for posting this info!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]melantha71
2008-04-28 02:21 am UTC (link)
At first I thought this was a hoax but it is looking like more sources are confirming this is for real. I come from a family of visual artists and I am a pro musician and this absolutely terrifies me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 02:27 am UTC (link)
I wish it was a hoax, it's ridiculous enough to be but unfortunately it is quite real. I know, this could make it so that many of us can't afford to continue on.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]melantha71
2008-04-28 02:49 am UTC (link)
I wonder if this will affect fashion designers, as well. God this is scary 1984 Orwellian shit. Granted, it's happening a little later than '84, LOL

Big Brother. Closer than you think...it started with wiretapping us and is going straight for our creative works...I swear I am ready to renew my passport and GTFO but because of HOMELAND SECURITY a fucking passport is $150 bucks now!

*smacks head*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 02:54 am UTC (link)
It will potentially affect everyone because anything, photos of your family, your journal, letters you've written, is up for grabs. I don't see how it can pass but stranger things have happened and it does appear that the powers that be are looking to gain further control over our lives.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]melantha71
2008-04-28 02:59 am UTC (link)
Gaaaaaaah I've had my live journal for 7 years!!! *smacks head*

There's no way this can pass. I refuse to believe it!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

craps
[info]scaredsquee
2008-04-28 05:32 am UTC (link)
http://maradydd.livejournal.com/374886.html

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: craps
[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 02:28 pm UTC (link)
I read the actual bill. Those problems, in my opinion do exsist. The intention of the bill and what will actually happen should it pass are vastly different.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]doc__holliday
2008-04-28 08:30 am UTC (link)
Wow. This affects the US of A only, non? If so, another reason to move to Canada, American...!

In solidarity, I am signing that petition!

(Reply to this)


[info]hybridartifacts
2008-04-28 09:39 am UTC (link)
I have seen a lot of talk about orphan works legislation- from what I can see it has the fundamental problem that it is in clear breach of the Berne International convention, to which the USA is a signatory nation, in that it seeks to restrict and control the basic right of a creator to their work (so far as I understand it-and its bloody complex like all copyright law).

If it does get passed, I believe there might be general provision for registering a 'collection' - in which case old works will be able to be registered en-mass rather than one by one so saving on fees-but of course this is still bloody awful for new works. It is also very problematic for works posted online but created in other countries. I don't know whose copyright legislation affects them. Does a work I create in the UK (covered by copyright automatically with no need for registration) need to be registered in the USA? Or can I just sue the pants off someone taking my work and claiming its 'orphaned' if they live in the USA and found my work online?

All in all it seems a silly, badly drafted work. It still may not get through because of a)its breeching Berne (is the USA saying it is withdrawing from international copyright agreements just like its effectively withdrawing from most human rights conventions/the Geneva convention over torture etc...i.e. by stealth while denying it?) and b)it has holes a mile wide in it.

The best thing for US artists is to keep an eye on the IPA pages you linked to in your post (great to see you posting the link) since they are the ones who have artists best interests at heart and seem to be making the right sort of noises/efforts. Support them and follow their leads etc.

(Reply to this)


[info]playright
2008-04-28 01:49 pm UTC (link)
Actually, that's a rather dramatized version of what the law is actually written about.
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/04/orphan-works-act-of-2008.html

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 03:03 pm UTC (link)
Both versions of of the bill I read look potentially problematic to me. Whether people over dramatized this or not I definitely think it's good that people are reading this and thinking about it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]playright
2008-04-28 03:06 pm UTC (link)
Agreed, however the copyright office is opposed to this bill, they don't have the capacity time/space to process all that this bill would entail.

It will never pass its committtees.

I've already called to chat with my reps, they agree and are checking to see where it is.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 03:11 pm UTC (link)
I would love to find out that this is a moot point and thank you for sharing your information.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]playright
2008-04-28 03:13 pm UTC (link)
I'm a photographer and my fine art prints/others are just as succeptible to these sorts of dynamics.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 03:47 pm UTC (link)
Of course. I would rather people be overly cautious when it comes to this stuff than to just poo poo it and not give it a second thought. It's to easy right now for our own government to pull the wool over our eyes.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]playright
2008-04-28 04:05 pm UTC (link)
I'm on the phone with a copyright lawyer, colleague, will let you know what his take is on it. He's just back from D.C. and the copyright office and a group of copyright lawyers.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 04:45 pm UTC (link)
Fantastic, thank you.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]enchant_adorn
2008-04-28 03:01 pm UTC (link)
Oh my...very frightening. Thanks for posting this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 03:06 pm UTC (link)
There are counter points to the email I posted so just read the bill itself and see what you think.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pascalbijou
2008-04-28 03:02 pm UTC (link)
this is crazy! why why why? i just signed the petition. thanks for posting this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 03:07 pm UTC (link)
Read the bill itself, I see it as being problematic personally but others have no problem with it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]britonard
2008-04-28 05:19 pm UTC (link)
My brother works in D.C. and I had him check out the current status of this bill, it doesn't seem to have a lot of support, it only has 3 co-sponsors. It is a house bill right now and still in committee, so getting those petitions in can be helpful, apparently there is no senate bill yet. Hope that helps, and I agree with an above poster that some of the info out there is dramatic, but there have been a lot of laws passed that included issues that didn't seem like they would have huge effects, but that did.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]britonard
2008-04-28 05:20 pm UTC (link)
must add though that I am confused that my brother and I are agreeing on something in regards to politics, which makes me wonder a bit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tina_imel
2008-04-28 05:37 pm UTC (link)
Yup, sometimes it happens!

There are people taking the bill at face value and people trying to read between the lines. There is also plenty of conflicting information out there. At the end of the day it needs more looking into and people need to calmly seek information from all sides and make informed decisions.
I've been called names over this and people are writing me nasty emails. It's ridiculous.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]fraulein_klein
2008-04-29 01:49 pm UTC (link)
i haven't read it all but this is nuts. is it only for americans or are your gov trying to make a lunatic-law for worldwide matters..?!

anyway this is insane.
["scene at home"

-aaah so i see you've got a picasso here, is it real?
- yes, but it's not picasso that painted this, I did]

OK so that was very ENHANCED but anyhoo it feels like this is how things would be.
Although i presume that you cannot register a copywrite on celebrety artist but blahblah,,,. insane is all i can say.-

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…